The phrase “biological clock” often brings to mind images of a mother’s age and dwindling eggs. But two significant studies published in 2025 are shifting the narrative, showing that while maternal age matters, paternal age carries its own distinct risks too.
Women’s Eggs: More Resilient Than Some Assumed
A study titled “Allele frequency selection and no age-related increase in human oocyte mitochondrial mutations” (published in Science Advances) analysed 80 individual oocytes (egg cells) from 22 women aged 20 to 42, alongside samples of their blood and saliva.
Key findings:
-
The mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in egg cells showed 17 to 24 times fewer mutations compared to somatic tissues (blood/saliva).
-
Unlike blood and saliva, the egg cells did not show an age-related increase in mtDNA mutation frequency from age 20 to 42.
-
The mutations observed in eggs were more likely in non-coding regions (which are less likely to affect function) rather than in the coding regions of the mtDNA.
-
The authors propose that human oocytes may have protective mechanisms (selection or repair) that limit mutation accumulation over time.
What this means for parents-to-be: it’s reassuring news. It suggests that at least one aspect of egg DNA (mitochondrial DNA) remains stable with maternal age in the studied age range. However, it’s important to stay grounded: this study looked at a specific part of the egg’s genetic makeup, not all possible age-related changes (like chromosomal errors or declining egg count) were addressed.
Men’s Sperm: A Different Age Story
On the paternal side, a landmark study titled “Sperm sequencing reveals extensive positive selection in the male germline” (published in Nature, October 2025) analysed sperm samples from 81 men aged roughly 24 to 75.
Highlights include:
-
The study used ultra-high accuracy sequencing (NanoSeq) to detect rare mutations in sperm DNA.
-
They found 40 genes under significant positive selection in the male germline, meaning some sperm-cell lineages carried harmful mutations that actually had a selective advantage in sperm production.
-
Sperm from older men accumulated more of these mutations, increasing the relative risk of passing them to offspring (even though absolute risk remains small).
-
This phenomenon helps explain why children of older fathers may have slightly higher risk of developmental or neurological conditions.
For fathers (and prospective fathers): the message is that paternal age isn’t just a social or lifestyle factor. It carries biological implications for sperm DNA quality and genetic inheritance.
So What’s the Parenting Take-away?
-
For mothers: The notion that “egg DNA quality inevitably worsens with every year” is challenged by the new egg-cell study, at least in terms of mtDNA for ages up to ~42. But remember: fertility still declines with age due to other mechanisms (egg count, chromosomal anomalies).
-
For fathers: The accumulating evidence means age matters. Sperm DNA mutation and selective processes in sperm production suggest older fathers carry higher genetic risk (albeit modest).
-
For both parents: Fertility and child health are team matters. It’s not “just the mother’s age” or “just the father’s age”. It’s the combined biological picture. Being informed empowers shared decision-making.
-
For planning: Age is one of many factors (health, lifestyle, genetics, environment). These studies add nuance, not panic to the conversation.
A Note on Perspective
While the studies mark important progress, they also have limits:
-
The egg study focused only on mitochondrial DNA in women up to age 42 and did not measure every aspect of egg quality.
-
The sperm study shows increased mutation rates but does not mean every older father will have children with health issues. It is about risk, not certainty.
-
These findings don’t immediately alter clinical guidelines, but they provide stronger foundations for discussions between parents and fertility or genetic counsellors.
Final Thoughts
In short: yes, both parents have a biological clock, but it ticks differently. Mom’s egg DNA shows unexpected resilience (at least in one dimension), whereas dad’s sperm DNA shows age-related changes with potential implications.
Parenthood isn’t just about when she conceives. It’s about when both parents step into that role, with eyes open and hearts ready.
