How does PSLE in its current form benefit your child? If no-one, including MOE, has been able to clearly explain to you the benefits of PSLE, it’s because there aren’t any!
Is PSLE needed to check the level of learning of children at the end of primary school?
- Computer Adaptive Testing, in which questions are guided by the level of understanding demonstrated in previous questions, so e.g. if a child is getting a lot of questions correct, subsequent questions will grow harder to hone in on their true level of understanding. Similarly, if they are getting a lot of questions wrong, subsequent questions will be easier.
- Testing at multiple timepoints throughout P6, using shorter tests, in multiple formats including multiple-choice questions, short written answers, individual or group projects, presentations, class discussions, hands-on challenges, etc.
This takes away the stress and anxiety of facing a series of long, high-stakes exams in one shot, and allows one to gauge a child’s average performance, not the result of one good or bad day. It also does not penalise children who have trouble focusing or writing for long periods, a still common issue among 11-12 year olds.
Help us get back on track—take the survey and be part of the solution.
Is PSLE needed to sort children into secondary schools based on ability?
- Very good at one subject and not so good at another;
- Held back by their inability to focus for long periods, read through long passages, or write long answers;
- Held back by their inability to stay calm long enough to demonstrate their true level of understanding (no one’s brain works well when they are worried/ nervous/ anxious!);
- Dealing with familial, social, financial or health issues during that period that affect their focus, energy or motivation; or
- Just having a bad day!
“As streaming formally begins early (in Singapore) – at age 12 – late bloomers are at a disadvantage compared to their counterparts in some other advanced countries.”
Assoc Prof John Donaldson, SMU(Singapore Management University) School of Social Sciences
Or taking it a step further, if we really claim to want an inclusive society shouldn’t everyone else be required to learn how to live, learn and play together in the same school?
A handful of secondary schools who want to remain selective can still have their own competitive entrance exams, or continue to use PSLE if they want. But there does not seem to be any good reason to feed the vast majority of Singaporean children into this blunt and rather damaging sorting machine.
Help us get back on track—take the survey and be part of the solution.
“Removing the PSLE will free up substantive PSLE preparation time which is often hot-housing time to crunch a few selected academic subjects such as English, Mathematics, Science and Chinese, which do not reflect a holistic education.”
“Abolishing the PSLE will provide real space to prepare students to become the curious, agile and more self-directed learner that the future economy needs.”
It will also reduce the “self-inflicted pressure and stress in students, families and teachers who have to choose between educating, learning or teaching to the test”.
Is PSLE something that 11-12 year olds in other good education systems go through?
No, it isn’t. No other country with a good education system has its first high-stakes exam at such a young age. This graph shows the ages at which the 25 top performing countries in the PISA rankings have their first high-stakes exam. Only Singapore has it younger than 15 years:
ALSO READ
NDR 2024 Unveils 5 Key Changes Transforming Education for Your Child’s Success
Phase 2A Singapore Oversubscription Sparks Debate on Education Equity
Education Advocates Push for Child Tracking After Johor Police Station Attack